A large igneous province ( LIP) is an extremely large accumulation of , including intrusive rock (sills, dikes) and extrusive rock (lava flows, tephra deposits), arising when magma travels through the crust towards the surface. The formation of LIPs is variously attributed to or to processes associated with divergent plate tectonics. The formation of some of the LIPs in the past 500 million years coincide in time with extinction event and rapid climatic changes, which has led to numerous hypotheses about causal relationships. LIPs are fundamentally different from any other currently or volcanic systems.
In 2008, Bryan and Ernst refined the definition to narrow it somewhat: "Large Igneous Provinces are magmatic provinces with areal extents >, igneous volumes > and maximum lifespans of ~50 Myr that have intraplate tectonic settings or geochemical affinities, and are characterised by igneous pulse(s) of short duration (~1–5 Myr), during which a large proportion (>75%) of the total igneous volume has been emplaced. They are dominantly mafic, but also can have significant ultramafic and silicic components, and some are dominated by silicic magmatism." This definition places emphasis on the high magma emplacement rate characteristics of the LIP event and excludes seamounts, seamount groups, submarine ridges and anomalous seafloor crust.S.E. Bryan & R.E. Ernst; Revised definition of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs); Earth-Science Reviews Vol. 86 (2008) pp. 175–202
The definition has since been expanded and refined, and remains a work in progress. Some new definitions of LIP include large granitic provinces such as those found in the Andes Mountains of South America and in western North America. Comprehensive taxonomies have been developed to focus technical discussions. Sub-categorization of LIPs into large volcanic provinces (LVP) and large plutonic provinces (LPP), and including rocks produced by normal plate tectonic processes, have been proposed, but these modifications are not generally accepted. LIP is now frequently used to also describe voluminous areas of, not just mafic, but all types of igneous rocks. Further, the minimum threshold to be included as a LIP has been lowered to 50,000 km2. The working taxonomy, focused heavily on geochemistry, is:
The study of LIPs has economic implications. Some workers associate them with trapped hydrocarbons. They are associated with economic concentrations of copper–nickel and iron. They are also associated with formation of major mineral provinces including platinum group element deposits and, in the silicic LIPs, silver and gold deposits. Titanium and vanadium deposits are also found in association with LIPs.
LIPs in the geological record have marked major changes in the hydrosphere and atmosphere, leading to major climate shifts and maybe mass extinctions of species. Some of these changes were related to rapid release of Greenhouse gas from the lithosphere to the atmosphere. Thus the LIP-triggered changes may be used as cases to understand current and future environmental changes.
Plate tectonic theory explains topography using interactions between the tectonic plates, as influenced by viscous stresses created by flow within the underlying mantle. Since the mantle is extremely viscous, the mantle flow rate varies in pulses which are reflected in the lithosphere by small amplitude, long wavelength undulations. Understanding how the interaction between mantle flow and lithosphere elevation influences formation of LIPs is important to gaining insights into past mantle dynamics. LIPs have played a major role in Wilson Cycle continental breakup, continental formation, new crustal additions from the upper mantle, and supercontinent cycles.
Ocean-plate creation at upwellings, spreading and subduction are well accepted fundamentals of plate tectonics, with the upwelling of hot mantle materials and the sinking of the cooler ocean plates driving the mantle convection. In this model, tectonic plates diverge at , where hot mantle rock flows upward to fill the space. Plate-tectonic processes account for the vast majority of Earth's volcanism.
Beyond the effects of convectively driven motion, deep processes have other influences on the surface topography. The convective circulation drives up-wellings and down-wellings in Earth's mantle that are reflected in local surface levels. Hot mantle materials rising up in a plume can spread out radially beneath the tectonic plate causing regions of uplift. These ascending plumes play an important role in LIP formation.
When created, LIPs often have an areal extent of a few million square kilometers and volumes on the order of 1 million cubic kilometers. In most cases, the majority of a basaltic LIP's volume is emplaced in less than 1 million years. One of the conundra of such LIPs' origins is to understand how enormous volumes of basaltic magma are formed and erupted over such short time scales, with effusion rates up to an order of magnitude greater than mid-ocean ridge basalts. The source of many or all LIPs are variously attributed to mantle plumes, to processes associated with plate tectonics or to meteorite impacts.
The origin of hotspots remains controversial. Hotspots that reach the Earth's surface may have three distinct origins. The deepest probably originate from the boundary between the lower mantle and the core; roughly 15–20% have characteristics such as presence of a linear chain of sea mounts with increasing ages, LIPs at the point of origin of the track, low shear wave velocity indicating high temperatures below the current location of the track, and ratios of 3He to 4He which are judged consistent with a deep origin. Others such as the Pitcairn hotspot, Samoa hotspot and Society hotspot hotspots appear to originate at the top of large, transient, hot Lava dome (termed superswells) in the mantle. The remainder appear to originate in the upper mantle and have been suggested to result from the breakup of subducting lithosphere.
Recent imaging of the region below known hotspots (for example, Yellowstone and Hawaii) using seismic-wave tomography has produced mounting evidence that supports relatively narrow, deep-origin, convective plumes that are limited in region compared to the large-scale plate tectonic circulation in which they are imbedded. Images reveal continuous but convoluted vertical paths with varying quantities of hotter material, even at depths where crystallographic transformations are predicted to occur.E. Humphreys and B. Schmandt; Looking for Mantle Plumes; Physics Today; August 2011; pp. 34–39
A second impact-related model of hotspot and LIP formation has been suggested in which minor hotspot volcanism was generated at large-body impact sites and flood basalt volcanism was triggered antipodally by focused seismic energy. This model has been challenged because impacts are generally considered seismically too inefficient, and the Deccan Traps of India were not antipodal to (and began erupting several Myr before) the Chicxulub crater in Mexico. In addition, no clear example of impact-induced volcanism, unrelated to melt sheets, has been confirmed at any known terrestrial crater.
Dykes are typically sub-vertical to vertical. When upward flowing (dyke-forming) magma encounters horizontal boundaries or weaknesses, such as between layers in a sedimentary deposit, the magma can flow horizontally creating a sill. Some sill provinces have areal extents >1000 km.
Several mechanisms are proposed to explain the association of LIPs with extinction events. The eruption of basaltic LIPs onto the earth's surface releases large volumes of sulfate gas, which forms sulfuric acid in the atmosphere; this absorbs heat and causes substantial cooling (e.g., the Laki eruption in Iceland, 1783). Oceanic LIPs can reduce oxygen in seawater by either direct oxidation reactions with metals in hydrothermal fluids or by causing algal blooms that consume large amounts of oxygen.
Hotspots
Plate ruptures
Early formed reservoir outpourings
Meteorites
Correlations with LIP formation
Dyke swarms
Sills
Volcanic rifted margins
Hotspots
Columbia River Basalt Northwestern US Yellowstone hotspot Ethiopia-Yemen Flood Basalts Ethiopia, Yemen North Atlantic Igneous Province Northern Canada, Greenland, the Faeroe Islands, Norway, Ireland and Scotland Iceland hotspot Deccan Traps India Réunion hotspot Rajmahal Traps India Ninety East Ridge Kerguelen Plateau Indian Ocean Kerguelen hotspot Ontong Java Plateau Pacific Ocean Louisville hotspot
Paraná and Etendeka traps Brazil–Namibia Tristan hotspot
Karoo-Ferrar South Africa, Antarctica, Australia & New Zealand Marion Island Caribbean large igneous province Caribbean-Colombian oceanic plateau Galápagos hotspot Sur l'âge des trapps basaltiques (On the ages of flood basalt events); Vincent E. Courtillot & Paul R. Renne; Comptes Rendus Geoscience; Vol: 335 Issue: 1, January 2003; pp: 113–140 Mackenzie Large Igneous Province Canadian Shield Mackenzie hotspot
Relationship to extinction events
Ore deposits
Mercury anomalies
Examples
Agulhas Plateau Southwest Indian Ocean, South Atlantic Ocean, Southern Ocean 140–95 0.3 1.2 Southeast African LIP
Mozambique Ridge, Northeast Georgia Rise, Maud Rise, Astrid RidgeColumbia River Basalt Northwestern US 17–6 0.16 0.175 Ethiopia-Yemen Flood Basalts Yemen, Ethiopia 31–25 0.6 0.35 Ethiopia North Atlantic Igneous Province Northern Canada, Greenland, the Faeroe Islands, Norway, Ireland, and Scotland 62–55 1.3 6.6 Jameson Land
Thulean Plateau
Deccan Traps India 66 0.5–0.8 0.5–1.0 Madagascar 88 TH Torsvik, RD Tucker, LD Ashwal, EA Eide, NA Rakotosolofo, MJ de Wit. "Late Cretaceous magmatism in Madagascar: palaeomagnetic evidence for a stationary Marion hotspot." Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 164, Issues 1–2, 15 December 1998, Pages 221–232 Rajmahal India 116 E.V. Verzhbitsky. "Geothermal regime and genesis of the Ninety-East and Chagos-Laccadive ridges." Journal of Geodynamics, Volume 35, Issue 3, April 2003, Pages 289–302 Ontong Java Plateau Pacific Ocean 1.86 8.4 Manihiki Plateau and Hikurangi Plateau
High Arctic Large Igneous Province Svalbard, Franz Josef Land, Sverdrup Basin, Amerasian Basin, and northern Greenland 130-60 > 1.0
Paraná and Etendeka traps Brazil, Namibia 134–129 1.5 > 1 Equatorial Atlantic Magmatic Province
Brazilian Highlands
Karoo-Ferrar South Africa, Antarctica, Australia, and New Zealand 183–180 0.15–2 0.37 - 0.57 Central Atlantic magmatic province Northern South America, Northwest Africa, Iberia, Eastern North America 199–197 11 2.5 (2.0–3.0) Siberian Traps Russia 250 1.5–3.9 0.9–2.0
Emeishan Traps Southwestern China 253–250 0.25
Warakurna large igneous province Australia 1078–1073 1.5 Eastern Pilbara
Large rhyolitic provinces
Large andesitic provinces
Large basaltic provinces
Continental flood basalts
Oceanic flood basalts
Large basaltic–rhyolitic provinces
Large plutonic provinces
Large granitic provinces
Silicic-dominated large igneous provinces
See also
Further reading
External links
|
|